User login
Recent posts
- Rogers family looking to get America's Most Wanted on the case
- Nine evacuated in Friday fire
- Injury accident on Steele Road
- BPU study: Leaks down, less hydrants out of service
- Attention Qualified Design/Build Firms:
- PHOTOS: KCKCC child care children learn about Native America musical instruments
- COURT BEAT: Wichita pharmacy manager sentenced in KCK today
- BPU to be closed next Thursday, Friday
- POLICE BEAT: KCKPD, other police agencies to increase traffic enforcement during Thanksgiving
- KCKCC remains undefeated, head for showdown with Penn Valley
Recent comments
- It's the best thing to happen...
by Wayne Headrick - Decorating our...
by Bob Parker - Not sure I really care about...
by D Thompson - A blonde driving a car became...
by fred meyer - I like it when it snows on...
by Michaelanne Duncan - Are they going to continue...
by Michaelanne Duncan - It is also a third rail in...
by fred meyer - I had a great time reading...
by Gold Baker - John: I have a ton of readers...
by Nick Sloan - And your blog is hiccuping....
by John Altevogt
Connect With Us
- Join the Kansas City Kansan group on Facebook
- Follow us on Twitter
- Subscribe to our channels on YouTube: News and Sports
- Subscribe to our RSS feed
Who's new
Guest Post: U.S. Rep. Dennis Moore on health care reform
EDITOR's NOTE: This is a guest column from U.S. Rep. Dennis Moore on the health care reform issue.
The House of Representatives will soon be voting on landmark legislation to reform our severely flawed health care system. H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, will ensure health coverage for over 96% of American citizens and end abusive practices by some in the insurance industry.
I will be voting for this bill because it addresses the issues of affordability, fiscal responsibility, quality and choice. We can no longer afford to do nothing. We must meet this challenge head-on.
This bill will not only dramatically improve the health care system for those who already have insurance they like and want to keep, it benefits those who don’t have insurance now. I want to update you on the parts of this reform that will affect you.
H.R. 3962 will place limits on insurance companies that indiscriminately drop individuals for pre-existing conditions, allowing the insurer to look only at the last 30 days for a pre-existing condition, instead of the current 6 month standard. Ultimately there will be a complete ban on the practice.
Additionally, health insurers will no long be able to rescind coverage. This happens when individuals are dropped from their insurance policies as a way for the insurer to avoid paying for treatment when a policyholder gets sick.
Similarly, insurance companies currently have limits on the maximum lifetime pay-out for policyholders. This practice will be banned, allowing a continuity of care.
The legislation will begin to close the Medicare Part D “donut hole” immediately. Effective January 1, 2010, $500 per enrollee from Medicare will be used to shrink the prescription drug donut hole, closing the gap completely in 2019.
Medicare beneficiaries will also have the opportunity to reap the benefits of negotiated rates on name brand prescriptions as a result of these reforms, reducing the overall cost spent on medication every month. I have advocated this reform throughout my service in Congress. There will be NO cuts in benefits for Medicare enrollees.
The age ceiling for dependents would increase to 26, so parents can decide if they would like to extend their coverage to young adults. This is a particularly important provision given the number of young adults who lack health care after they leave college, but before they get a job.
This reform also provides for a “public option”, which extends basic, affordable health care to the 47,000 residents of our district who are uninsured, which ultimately reduces costs for their neighbors who now have insurance. The option will be available in a new health insurance exchange, where the uninsured and small employers will be able to comparison shop for standardized health packages.
With the implementation of a public option, we will reduce our deficit by $30 billion over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Put simply, we will be spending less on health care, which saves our country money. We will drive down premiums and provide affordable coverage.
Especially in these tough economic times, we should be doing everything we can to reduce the financial burden on middle class Americans, which is why households making less than $1 million will not see their taxes increase to pay for this program. Additional revenues come from meaningful crackdowns on excessive payments of your tax dollars to certain categories of Medicare providers.
This plan is fully paid for, so it will not add to our debt. We cannot begin to get the deficit under control without tackling the challenge of health care.
I know that many have questions about this proposal and would like to read or review a detailed summary of it. These documents and other background materials are available at my website: http://www.moore.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=35§iontree=6,35.
1. What are, "excessive payments of your tax dollars to certain categories of Medicare providers"?
2. How many of the 47,000 uninsured residents are illegal residents?
3. What is being done to remove illegal residents from our district, or what is being done to register them so to make sure they are paying their share of taxes?
4. How is a gov't beurocracy (which I assume to be extremely inefficient) going to compete with private companies (which I assume to be more efficient in comparison)?
Again, thank you for directly addressing national healthcare.
Wayne Headrick
As long as you continue to vote with blinders on you do not represent the people of Kansas.
Be sure to give Nancy P. a kiss for all of us.
YOU WILL BE FIRED. have a nice day.
Go ahead an vote your conscience and not what the voters want. November of 2010 is fast approaching and we will remember in the 3rd District. By the way, you do have a choice now. Look at the Republican bill and see health care reform as it should be done! I have several family members that live in Olathe and they will not be voting for you in 2010. I just wish the election was tomorrow to eliminate any Moore damage you might cause.
Sorry about your situation. I have a preexisting condition and have had problems buying insurance but group health takes care of that.(thank God) That is something I think all agree on.
The problem is how do we solve it? I for one don't want the Gov running it that is for sure. I have an open mind about the rest of it. Just keep the bureaucracy out of my health. I would rather deal with the demon insurance companies than the demon US gov bureaucracy.
Many say that you are not listening to your voters but I disagree. Although this vote would be against the loud, vocal, boisterous minority, it indeed supports the vast majority of Kansans without a voice - the Kansans that can't afford to be heard, the Kansans that can't stage these tea party rebellions, the Kansans that truly recognize that our system is broken and that we need change.
I absolutely believe that you are voting in the best interest of the 3rd district, and the future of our great country. Thank you, Congressman Moore.
Don't let the vocal minority get you down!
Don't you mean vocal Majority?
the newly poor (due to housing and jobs) If I was ever homeless I guarantee I would not be watching tv, using the internet or attending meetings. I would be hunting for a job and food for my children. Some voices are silent....I know because I have a son with Autism. It is insane for insurance companies to deny these children coverage.
Better hope eugenics never shows it's ugly head in this country. Your son will really be in trouble. With all this talk of saving money here and there in health care it and euthanasia could show up in any system. Pray it doesn't happen.
but I have been very impressed with the special education he has received from our school district. Educators care....they make little money. Insurance companies don't care....and are filthy rich. Go figure.
If you think the government could do better than a private insurance company I would have to disagree. Money talks B.S. walks. In government or the private sector.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/294/5540/59
"We seem to be increasingly unwilling to accept what we view as imperfection in ourselves and others. As health care costs skyrocket, we are coming to accept a bottom-line, cost-benefit analysis of human life. This mind-set has serious implications for reproductive decisions. If a health maintenance organization (HMO) requires in utero screening, and refuses to cover the birth or care of a purportedly "defective" child, how close is this to eugenics? If gene or drug therapy is substituted for improving our workplace or school environments, our diets and our exercise practices, how close is this to eugenics? Significant social changes are expensive, however. If eugenics means making reproductive decisions primarily on the basis of social cost, then we are well on that road."
Moore must go. He is not for the people or he would not burden us with something like this.
So many questions and no answers. Every one want something for nothing and or someone else to pay for it.
The hope is that the senate will not let this stand.
Moore tea parties on the way!
I am angry.
Think about the underhanded way this went down. Late Saturday night! My God that should tip you off by itself. All the secrecy in the meeting an on and on. Just what the heck are they trying to hide!
Maggie
She dose that all the time then gets upset if we call her a name. I will see all at the polls. We shall overcome.
"* The AARP got a financial windfall in return for its support of the healthcare bill. Over the past decade, the AARP has morphed from an advocacy group to an insurance company (through its subsidiary company). It is one of the main suppliers of Medi-gap insurance, a high-cost, privately purchased coverage that picks up where Medicare leaves off.
But President Bush-43 passed the Medicare Advantage program, which offered a subsidized, lower-cost alternative to Medi-gap. Under Medicare Advantage, the elderly get all the extra coverage they need plus coordinated, well-managed care, usually by the same physician. So more than 10 million seniors went with Medicare Advantage, cutting into AARP Medi-gap revenues.
Presto! Obama solved their problem. He eliminates subsidies for Medicare Advantage. The elderly will have to pay more for coverage under Medigap, but the AARP -- which supposedly represents them -- will make more money. (If this galls you, join the American Seniors Association, the alternative group; contact sbarton@americanseniors.org. This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .)"
-------------------
AARP is simply being driven by greed. They have long been a stalking horse for the left and Obama's Deathcare lines their pockets.
(Click here for larger version)
Weather for Kansas City, KS

Current Conditions:
Fair, 55 F
Forecast:
Fri - Mostly Clear. High: 56 Low: 43
Sat - Cloudy. High: 57 Low: 47
Full Forecast at Yahoo! Weather
(provided by The Weather Channel)
Regional Headlines
- Already limited doses of H1N1 flu take another hit
from The Kansas City Star - KCMO School District experiencing higher drop-out rates
- Suspect in KC murder arrested in Georgia
from KMBC Channel 9 - "Dog days" of summer not quite over for KCMO mayor
from Tony's Kansas City - Three charged in murder of Overland Park teen
from The Kansas City Star









Some of this is needed we all know that. It is not right to be canceled and not be able to get insurance for existing problems and so on, But how in the hell do you know what the bill really does? It is so long and complicated I bet you really don't know. Did you read it this time?
Mr Moore you are a chicken!